A few months back I was thinking about how some people (maybe myself included) pick a major in college because that's 'what they are good at.'
For instance, I was an engineering major because I was good at math and physics, and not so good at english and social studies.
So? What does that matter? At least I like math (some what) and I love physics problems. But I've met a number of people along the way that were in these programs because that's 'what they were good at' or their parents encouraged them too due to where they were excelling in high school.
I think that's completely wrong. You should do what you enjoy, what may take some time to grow into, it should be nurtured. Just because your good in math doesn't mean you'll make a good engineer, and just because you're bad in math doesn't mean you'll make a bad engineer. In the latter example, maybe you're math skills aren't so hot, but you problem solving abilities are very creative and can lead to new innovation.
Suggestion: Maybe schools (high school and/or college) could teach
methods. Think about the ability to take classes in the following
methods:
- Problem Solving (engineer) (using your analytics)
- Studying (doctors & such) (using your memory)
- Writing/Arts (writers, photographers, artists, actors, ...) (using your creative nature)
- ... and some others, I welcome feed back.
So rather then everybody taking the same math class, there are different spins on the class depending on your '
method' of thinking/learning. A math class for a problem solver will be very different then a math class for an artist.
I was thinking about it this way because fundamentally, I'm a problem solver, not a math person. Math comes naturally to me for my ability to solve problems and think analytically, not the other way around.
Any thoughts?
tags: education learning teaching schooling
Categories: ideas